recategorized by
339 views
0 votes
0 votes

Street crime can be averted through regulations mandating the lighting of streetlights during daytime. As daytime visibility is worse in nations farther from the equator, so obviously such regulations would be more successful in averting crime there. Actually, the only nations that have adopted such regulations are farther from the equator than the continental United States. Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above? 

  1. Bystanders in the continental United States who were near lit streetlights during the day would be just as likely to become victims of a crime as would bystanders who were not near lit streetlights. 
  2. Inadequate daytime visibility is the single most important factor in street crime in numerous nations that are located farther from the equator than is the continental United States. 
  3. In nations that have daytime streetlight regulations, the percentage of street crime that happens in the daytime is greater than in the continental United States.
  4. Daytime streetlight regulations would probably do less to avert street crime in the continental United States than they do in the nations that have the regulations.
recategorized by

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions