edited by
345 views
0 votes
0 votes

NOT everything looks lovelier the longer and closer its inspection. But Saturn does. It is gorgeous through Earthly telescopes. However, the $13$ years of close observation provided by Cassini, an American spacecraft, showed the planet, its moons and its remarkable rings off better and better, revealing finer structures, striking novelties and greater drama$\dots$

By and large the big things in the solar system -planets and moons are thought of as having been around since the beginning. The suggestion that rings and moons are new is, though, made even more interesting by the fact that one of those moons, Enceladus, is widely considered the most promising site in the solar system on which to look for alien life. If Enceladus is both young and bears life, that life must have come into being quickly. This is also believed to have been the case on Earth. Were it true on Enceladus, that would encourage the idea that life evolves easily when conditions are right.

One reason tor thinking Saturn 's rings are young is that they are bright. The solar system is suffused with comet dust, and comet dust is dark. Leaving Saturn's ring system (which Cassini has shown to be more than $90$% water ice) out in such a mist is like leaving laundry hanging on a line downwind from a smokestack: it will get dirty. The lighter the rings are, the faster this will happen, for the less mass they contain, the less celestial pollution they can absorb before they start to discolour$\dots$Jeff Cuzzi, a scientist at America's space agency, $\text{NASA}$, who helped run Cassini, told the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston that combining the mass estimates with Cassini's measurements of the density of comet-dust near Saturn suggests the rings are no older than the first dinosaurs, nor younger than the last of them-that is, they are somewhere between $200$m and $70$m years old.

That timing fits well with a theory put forward in $2016$, by Matija Cuk of the $\text{SETI}$ Institute, in Califomia and his colleagues. They suggest that at around the same time as the rings came into being an old set of moons orbiting Saturn destroyed themselves, and from their remains emerged not only the rings but also the planet's current suite of inner moons Rhea, Dione, Tethys, Enceladus and Mimas$\dots$

Dr Cuk and his colleagues used computer simulations of Saturn's moons orbits as a sort of time machine. Looking at the rate at which tidal friction is causing these orbits to lengthen they extrapolated backwards to find out what those orbits would have looked like in the past. They discovered that about $100$m years ago the orbits of two of them, Tethys and Dione, would have interacted in a way that left the planes in which they orbit markedly tilted. But their orbits are untilted. The obvious, if unsettling. conclusion was that this interaction never happened and thus that at the time when it should have happened, Dione and Tethys were simply not there.They must have come into being later$\dots$

The main objective of the passage is to:

  1. establish that Saturn's rings and inner moons have been around since the beginning of time
  2. demonstrate how the orbital patterns of Saturn's rings and moons change over time
  3. highlight the beauty, finer structures and celestial drama of Saturn's rings and moons
  4. provide evidence that Saturn's rings and moons are recent creations
edited by

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions